[22-429] Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer

Supreme Court Oral Arguments

Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer

Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org

Argued on Oct 4, 2023.

Petitioner: Acheson Hotels, LLC.
Respondent: Deborah Laufer.

Advocates:

  • Adam G. Unikowsky (for the Petitioner)
  • Erica L. Ross (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting neither party)
  • Kelsi B. Corkran (for the Respondent)

Facts of the case (from oyez.org)

Deborah Laufer, a prolific litigant with physical disabilities and vision impairments, sued Acheson Hotels for failing to publish information about their accessibility on their website, which is required under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

The district court dismissed the lawsuit, finding that Laufer lacked standing to sue because had no plans to visit the hotel and thus suffered no injury as a result of the lack of information on the website. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit reversed, concluding that Laufer’s lack of intent to book a room at the hotel operated by Acheson does not negate the fact of injury.

Question

Does an ADA “tester” have Article III standing to challenge a hotel’s failure to provide disability accessibility information on its website, even if she has no plans to visit the hotel?

More description

Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer

Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org

Argued on Oct 4, 2023.

Petitioner: Acheson Hotels, LLC.
Respondent: Deborah Laufer.

Advocates:

  • Adam G. Unikowsky (for the Petitioner)
  • Erica L. Ross (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting neither party)
  • Kelsi B. Corkran (for the Respondent)

Facts of the case (from oyez.org)

Deborah Laufer, a prolific litigant with physical disabilities and vision impairments, sued Acheson Hotels for failing to publish information about their accessibility on their website, which is required under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

The district court dismissed the lawsuit, finding that Laufer lacked standing to sue because had no plans to visit the hotel and thus suffered no injury as a result of the lack of information on the website. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit reversed, concluding that Laufer’s lack of intent to book a room at the hotel operated by Acheson does not negate the fact of injury.

Question

Does an ADA “tester” have Article III standing to challenge a hotel’s failure to provide disability accessibility information on its website, even if she has no plans to visit the hotel?

2023-10-04 84 min
Listen elsewhere

Available Results

Generated results are saved to your library for reuse and search.

No generated results are available for this episode yet.

Transcript

No transcript is available for this episode yet.
Sign in to generate a transcript for review.
Sign in

Chapters

No chapters available.