How To Do Reputation Management | Ep. #298
Marketing School - Digital Marketing and Online Marketing Tips
In Episode #298, Eric and Neil discuss how to do reputation management. Tune in to learn the strategies you can use to control your negative results regarding your brand or website. Also find out why getting help from a third party can be very helpful when dealing with your antagonizers.
Time Stamped Show Notes:- 00:27 – Today’s topic: How To Do Reputation Management
- 00:34 – Reputation management is managing the negative result for a website or brand
- 01:04 – Ripoff Report has a ton of reviews
- 01:28 – First is to look at Moz or Ahrefs; look at the top 10 results and the number of links going to the top 10 results
- 01:46 – If you have a Facebook page, you can link that to the top 10 results to push negative results down
- 02:06 – Neil uses InboundJunction—it works out deals with the site and forms a contract so the text will be removed
- 02:16 – It is the most effective, but most expensive too
- 03:00 – The post was telling people that Neil isn’t an effective marketer
- 03:10 – Neil learned that there are people who are difficult to deal with and it’s much easier to just get a third party to solve it
- 03:20 – Doing guest posts on popular sites like Entrepreneur
- 03:43 – It is difficult for your site alone to take the 5 spots
- 03:56 – High domain authority pages can push links a lot faster
- 04:30 – Reputation is an online reputation management platform
- 05:00 – Andrew Stubbs is a pay per performance guy who can also help with reputation management
- 05:30 – Marketing School is giving away a free 1 year subscription of Zapier which automates different web apps, create and different workflows
- 06:00 – Subscribe, rate and review Marketing School
- 06:06 – Text MARKETINGSCHOOL to 33444
- 06:30 – That’s it for today’s episode!
- Once you see a negative result regarding your brand or website, find a way to control your traffic or your sales will suffer.
- There are people who enjoy tearing others down. Talking to them may be difficult so hire a third-party to negotiate with them.
- Linking to the top 5 spots can pull your positive results up.
Leave some feedback:
- What should we talk about next? Please let us know in the comments below.
- Did you enjoy this episode? If so, please leave a short review.
Connect with us:
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Available Results
Generated results are saved to your library for reuse and search.
Choose Template
Pick the result you want. You can review provider and model before generating.
A concise first-pass summary for understanding the episode quickly.
A comprehensive, source-grounded extraction of the reusable knowledge in an episode.
Technologies, AI models, technical methods, capabilities, limitations, and adoption implications.
Repeatable methods, frameworks, mental models, processes, and systems.
A dedicated analysis of warnings, limitations, trade-offs, weak evidence, and uncertainty.
A dedicated inventory of concrete resources named in the episode.
A concise first-pass summary for understanding the episode quickly.
A detailed readable summary organized by chapter or topic.
A navigable map of subjects, topic flow, and suggested chapters.
A comprehensive, source-grounded extraction of the reusable knowledge in an episode.
Reusable atomic knowledge units extracted from the episode.
A comprehensive extraction focused on health practices, protocols, claims, and safety caveats.
A comprehensive extraction focused on opportunities, strategy, markets, and company building.
Explicit actions, next steps, habits, recommendations, and things to avoid.
A dedicated inventory of concrete resources named in the episode.
A dedicated analysis of warnings, limitations, trade-offs, weak evidence, and uncertainty.
A concise first-pass summary for understanding the episode quickly.
A detailed readable summary organized by chapter or topic.
A navigable map of subjects, topic flow, and suggested chapters.
A comprehensive, source-grounded extraction of the reusable knowledge in an episode.
Reusable atomic knowledge units extracted from the episode.
A comprehensive extraction focused on health practices, protocols, claims, and safety caveats.
A comprehensive extraction focused on opportunities, strategy, markets, and company building.
Scientific findings, mechanisms, studies, hypotheses, and the limits of the evidence discussed.
Technologies, AI models, technical methods, capabilities, limitations, and adoption implications.
Investment theses, assets, catalysts, valuation reasoning, time horizons, and risks.
Chronologies, actors, causes, consequences, turning points, and competing historical interpretations.
Policies, proposals, stakeholders, arguments, implementation constraints, and predicted effects.
Career paths, skills, hiring signals, workplace decisions, transitions, and limitations of the advice.
Behavioral mechanisms, biases, motivation, habits, emotions, interventions, and evidence limitations.
Economic mechanisms, incentives, indicators, market structure, forecasts, and uncertainty.
Leadership principles, team systems, organizational design, culture, feedback, and failure modes.
Audience, positioning, messaging, acquisition, retention, experiments, metrics, and failed approaches.
Teaching methods, learning strategies, practice, feedback, assessment, and effectiveness evidence.
Theses, premises, arguments, objections, values, thought experiments, and unresolved questions.
Communication patterns, conflict, boundaries, expectations, repair methods, and contextual limitations.
Books, papers, authors, courses, and other learning resources mentioned in the episode.
Repeatable methods, frameworks, mental models, processes, and systems.
Explicit actions, next steps, habits, recommendations, and things to avoid.
Memorable statements and important claims with attribution and source context.
A dedicated inventory of concrete resources named in the episode.
A dedicated analysis of warnings, limitations, trade-offs, weak evidence, and uncertainty.