Search this show’s transcripts

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

en us
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
More details
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
Sources and links
Website Apple RSS

Episodes

Page 1 · 50 per page
Published 2026-04-29

Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc.

60 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide (1) when a generic drug manufacturer excludes a patented use from its label, whether it still be liable for inducing infringement if it calls its product a “generic version” of the brand-name drug and cites publicly available information about the brand-name drug's sales; and (2) whether a patent infringement complaint can survive dismissal if it does not allege that the defendant made any statement specifically instructing or encouraging the patented use.
More description
A case in which the Court will decide (1) when a generic drug manufacturer excludes a patented use from its label, whether it still be liable for inducing infringement if it calls its product a “generic version” of the brand-name drug and cites publicly available information about the brand-name drug's sales; and (2) whether a patent infringement complaint can survive dismissal if it does not allege that the defendant made any statement specifically instructing or encouraging the patented use.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2026-04-29

Mullin v. Doe

106 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Trump administration lawfully ended the Temporary Protected Status program for Syrian nationals.
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Trump administration lawfully ended the Temporary Protected Status program for Syrian nationals.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2026-04-28

Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe I

117 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Alien Tort Statute or the Torture Victim Protection Act allows a judicially-implied private right of action for aiding and abetting.
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Alien Tort Statute or the Torture Victim Protection Act allows a judicially-implied private right of action for aiding and abetting.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2026-04-27

Chatrie v. United States

120 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether execution of a geofence warrant in this case violated the Fourth Amendment.
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether execution of a geofence warrant in this case violated the Fourth Amendment.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web
Published 2026-04-27

Monsanto Company v. Durnell

74 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act preempts a label-based failure-to-warn claim where EPA has not required the warning.
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act preempts a label-based failure-to-warn claim where EPA has not required the warning.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2026-04-22

Blanche v. Lau

89 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether, to remove a lawful permanent resident who committed an offense listed in Section 1182(a)(2) and was subsequently paroled into the United States, the government must prove that it possessed clear and convincing evidence of the offense at the time of the lawful permanent resident’s last reentry into the United States.
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether, to remove a lawful permanent resident who committed an offense listed in Section 1182(a)(2) and was subsequently paroled into the United States, the government must prove that it possessed clear and convincing evidence of the offense at the time of the lawful permanent resident’s last reentry into the United States.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2026-04-21

Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T, Inc.

84 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Communications Act of 1934 provisions that govern the Federal Communications Commission’s assessment and enforcement of monetary forfeitures are consistent with the Seventh Amendment and Article III.
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Communications Act of 1934 provisions that govern the Federal Communications Commission’s assessment and enforcement of monetary forfeitures are consistent with the Seventh Amendment and Article III.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2026-04-20

Sripetch v. SEC

70 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether the SEC may seek equitable disgorgement under 15 U.S.C. §§ 78u(d)(5) and (d)(7) without showing investors suffered pecuniary harm.
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether the SEC may seek equitable disgorgement under 15 U.S.C. §§ 78u(d)(5) and (d)(7) without showing investors suffered pecuniary harm.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web
Published 2026-04-20

T. M. v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation

61 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, which prevents parties who lose in state courts from challenging injuries caused by state-court judgments, can be triggered by a state-court decision that remains subject to further review in state court.
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, which prevents parties who lose in state courts from challenging injuries caused by state-court judgments, can be triggered by a state-court decision that remains subject to further review in state court.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2026-04-01

Trump v. Barbara

128 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether Executive Order No. 14,160 issued by President Donald, which denies U.S. birthright citizenship to children born in the United States solely because their parents are in the country unlawfully or on temporary visas, is consistent with the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and 8 U.S.C. § 1401(a).
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether Executive Order No. 14,160 issued by President Donald, which denies U.S. birthright citizenship to children born in the United States solely because their parents are in the country unlawfully or on temporary visas, is consistent with the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and 8 U.S.C. § 1401(a).
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2026-03-31

Pitchford v. Cain

109 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Mississippi Supreme Court unreasonably decided—under the standards set by federal habeas law—that Terry Pitchford gave up his right to argue that the prosecutor’s explanations for striking four Black jurors were false or racially biased?
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Mississippi Supreme Court unreasonably decided—under the standards set by federal habeas law—that Terry Pitchford gave up his right to argue that the prosecutor’s explanations for striking four Black jurors were false or racially biased?
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2026-03-30

Abouammo v. United States

77 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether venue is proper in a district where no offense conduct took place, so long as the statute’s intent element “contemplates” effects that could occur there.
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether venue is proper in a district where no offense conduct took place, so long as the statute’s intent element “contemplates” effects that could occur there.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web
Published 2026-03-30

Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties

55 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether a federal court that initially exercises jurisdiction and stays a case pending arbitration maintains jurisdiction over a post-arbitration Section 9 or 10 application where jurisdiction would otherwise be lacking.
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether a federal court that initially exercises jurisdiction and stays a case pending arbitration maintains jurisdiction over a post-arbitration Section 9 or 10 application where jurisdiction would otherwise be lacking.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web
Published 2026-03-25

Flower Foods, Inc. v. Brock

78 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether workers who deliver locally goods that travel in interstate commerce—but who do not transport the goods across borders nor interact with vehicles that cross borders—are “transportation workers” “engaged in foreign or interstate commerce” for purposes of the exemption in Section 1 of the Federal Arbitration Act.
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether workers who deliver locally goods that travel in interstate commerce—but who do not transport the goods across borders nor interact with vehicles that cross borders—are “transportation workers” “engaged in foreign or interstate commerce” for purposes of the exemption in Section 1 of the Federal Arbitration Act.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2026-03-24

Noem v. Al Otro Lado

81 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether a noncitizen who is stopped on the Mexican side of the U.S.-Mexico border “arrives in the United States” within the meaning of Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq., which provides that a noncitizen who “arrives in the United States” may apply for asylum and must be inspected by an immigration officer.
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether a noncitizen who is stopped on the Mexican side of the U.S.-Mexico border “arrives in the United States” within the meaning of Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq., which provides that a noncitizen who “arrives in the United States” may apply for asylum and must be inspected by an immigration officer.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2026-03-24

Keathley v. Buddy Ayers Construction, Incorporated

69 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether the doctrine of judicial estoppel can be invoked to bar a plaintiff who fails to disclose a civil claim in bankruptcy filings from pursuing that claim simply because there is a potential motive for nondisclosure, regardless of whether there is evidence that the plaintiff in fact acted in bad faith.
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether the doctrine of judicial estoppel can be invoked to bar a plaintiff who fails to disclose a civil claim in bankruptcy filings from pursuing that claim simply because there is a potential motive for nondisclosure, regardless of whether there is evidence that the plaintiff in fact acted in bad faith.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2026-03-23

Watson v. Republican National Committee

128 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether the federal election-day statutes, 2 U.S.C. § 7, 2 U.S.C. § 1, and 3 U.S.C. § 1, preempt a state law that allows ballots that are cast by federal election day to be received by election officials after that day.
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether the federal election-day statutes, 2 U.S.C. § 7, 2 U.S.C. § 1, and 3 U.S.C. § 1, preempt a state law that allows ballots that are cast by federal election day to be received by election officials after that day.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web
Published 2026-03-04

Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC

99 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether 49 U.S.C. § 14501(c), preempts a state common-law claim against a broker for negligently selecting a motor carrier or driver.
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether 49 U.S.C. § 14501(c), preempts a state common-law claim against a broker for negligently selecting a motor carrier or driver.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2026-03-03

Hunter v. United States

95 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide (1) whether the only permissible exceptions to a general appeal waiver are for claims of ineffective assistance of counsel or that the sentence exceeds the statutory maximum; and (2) whether an appeal waiver applies when the sentencing judge advises the defendant that he has a right to appeal and the government does not object.
More description
A case in which the Court will decide (1) whether the only permissible exceptions to a general appeal waiver are for claims of ineffective assistance of counsel or that the sentence exceeds the statutory maximum; and (2) whether an appeal waiver applies when the sentencing judge advises the defendant that he has a right to appeal and the government does not object.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2026-03-02

United States v. Hemani

114 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3), which prohibits the possession of firearms by a person who “is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance,” violates the Second Amendment as applied to the respondent.
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3), which prohibits the possession of firearms by a person who “is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance,” violates the Second Amendment as applied to the respondent.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2026-02-25

Pung v. Isabella County

104 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide (1) whether taking and selling a home to satisfy a debt to the government, and keeping the surplus value as a windfall, violates the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment when the compensation is based on the artificially depressed auction sale price rather than the property's fair market value, and (2) whether the government’s forfeiture of real property whose value significantly exceeds the tax debt constitutes an excessive fine under the Eighth Amendment, particularly when the tax debt itself was disputed.
More description
A case in which the Court will decide (1) whether taking and selling a home to satisfy a debt to the government, and keeping the surplus value as a windfall, violates the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment when the compensation is based on the artificially depressed auction sale price rather than the property's fair market value, and (2) whether the government’s forfeiture of real property whose value significantly exceeds the tax debt constitutes an excessive fine under the Eighth Amendment, particularly when the tax debt itself was disputed.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web
Published 2026-02-24

Enbridge Energy, LP v. Nessel

62 min
View
A case in which the Court held that the thirty-day deadline for moving a lawsuit from state court to federal court is a mandatory rule that judges cannot extend for fairness reasons.
More description
A case in which the Court held that the thirty-day deadline for moving a lawsuit from state court to federal court is a mandatory rule that judges cannot extend for fairness reasons.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2026-02-23

Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Corporación Cimex, S.A. (Cuba)

91 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Helms-Burton Act grants U.S. courts jurisdiction over Cuban government agencies and instrumentalities sued for “trafficking” in confiscated property, even if the lawsuit does not satisfy one of the exceptions to immunity provided by the earlier, general Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA)?
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Helms-Burton Act grants U.S. courts jurisdiction over Cuban government agencies and instrumentalities sued for “trafficking” in confiscated property, even if the lawsuit does not satisfy one of the exceptions to immunity provided by the earlier, general Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA)?
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2026-02-23

Havana Docks Corporation v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.

92 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether the legal right to sue under Title III of the LIBERTAD Act is tied to the confiscated property claim or the hypothetical, unexpired duration of the original property interest.
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether the legal right to sue under Title III of the LIBERTAD Act is tied to the confiscated property claim or the hypothetical, unexpired duration of the original property interest.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web
Published 2026-01-21

Trump v. Cook

118 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether to stay a district court injunction preventing the President from removing a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors “for cause” based on pre-appointment conduct without prior notice or a hearing.
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether to stay a district court injunction preventing the President from removing a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors “for cause” based on pre-appointment conduct without prior notice or a hearing.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2026-01-20

M & K Employee Solutions, LLC v. Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund

57 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether pension plans calculating an employer's withdrawal liability “as of the end of the plan year” must use the financial assumptions that existed at year-end, or whether they can use different assumptions adopted after year-end as long as those assumptions are based on information available at the time.
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether pension plans calculating an employer's withdrawal liability “as of the end of the plan year” must use the financial assumptions that existed at year-end, or whether they can use different assumptions adopted after year-end as long as those assumptions are based on information available at the time.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2026-01-20

Wolford v. Lopez

111 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether a Hawaii law that makes it a crime for a licensed concealed carry permit holder to bring a handgun onto private property open to the public—such as a store or restaurant—unless the property owner gives "express authorization" violates the Second Amendment.
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether a Hawaii law that makes it a crime for a licensed concealed carry permit holder to bring a handgun onto private property open to the public—such as a store or restaurant—unless the property owner gives "express authorization" violates the Second Amendment.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web
Published 2026-01-14

Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corp.

69 min
View
A case in which the Court held that the New Jersey Transit Corporation is not an arm of the State of New Jersey for interstate sovereign immunity purposes.
More description
A case in which the Court held that the New Jersey Transit Corporation is not an arm of the State of New Jersey for interstate sovereign immunity purposes.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2026-01-13

West Virginia v. B.P.J.

81 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether Title IX and the Equal Protection Clause allow a state to designate school sports teams for girls and boys based on students’ biological sex as determined at birth.
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether Title IX and the Equal Protection Clause allow a state to designate school sports teams for girls and boys based on students’ biological sex as determined at birth.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web
Published 2026-01-13

Little v. Hecox

112 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Equal Protection Clause prohibits a State from categorically requiring sports participants to compete based on their biological sex, rather than gender identity.
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Equal Protection Clause prohibits a State from categorically requiring sports participants to compete based on their biological sex, rather than gender identity.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2026-01-12

Chevron USA Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana

77 min
View
A case in which the Court held that the federal officer removal statute allows a defendant to move a state-court suit to federal court if the challenged conduct has a plausible and close relationship to the performance of federal duties.
More description
A case in which the Court held that the federal officer removal statute allows a defendant to move a state-court suit to federal court if the challenged conduct has a plausible and close relationship to the performance of federal duties.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web
Published 2025-12-10

FS Credit Opportunities Corp. v. Saba Capital Master Fund, Ltd.

78 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether Section 47(b) of the Investment Company Act (ICA), 15 U.S.C. § 80a-46 (b), creates an implied private right of action.
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether Section 47(b) of the Investment Company Act (ICA), 15 U.S.C. § 80a-46 (b), creates an implied private right of action.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2025-12-10

Hamm v. Smith

121 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether and how courts may consider the cumulative effect of multiple IQ scores in assessing an Atkins claim.
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether and how courts may consider the cumulative effect of multiple IQ scores in assessing an Atkins claim.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2025-12-09

National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission

130 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether limits on coordinated party expenditures in 52 U.S.C. § 30116 violate the First Amendment, either on their face or as applied to party spending in connection with “party coordinated communications.”
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether limits on coordinated party expenditures in 52 U.S.C. § 30116 violate the First Amendment, either on their face or as applied to party spending in connection with “party coordinated communications.”
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2025-12-08

Trump v. Slaughter

150 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether the statutory removal protections for members of the Federal Trade Commission violate the separation of powers and, if so, whether Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, 295 U.S. 602 (1935), should be overruled.
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether the statutory removal protections for members of the Federal Trade Commission violate the separation of powers and, if so, whether Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, 295 U.S. 602 (1935), should be overruled.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web
Published 2025-12-03

Olivier v. City of Brandon, Mississippi

84 min
View
A case in which the Court held that its decision in Heck v. Humphrey does not bar claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeking only prospective relief when the plaintiff has previously been punished under the challenged law.
More description
A case in which the Court held that its decision in Heck v. Humphrey does not bar claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeking only prospective relief when the plaintiff has previously been punished under the challenged law.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2025-12-02

First Choice Women's Resource Centers, Inc. v. Platkin

82 min
View
A case in which the Court held that a government subpoena demanding a private organization's donor records inflicts an immediate injury to First Amendment freedom of association rights, allowing the organization to challenge the demand in federal court before it is enforced.
More description
A case in which the Court held that a government subpoena demanding a private organization's donor records inflicts an immediate injury to First Amendment freedom of association rights, allowing the organization to challenge the demand in federal court before it is enforced.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2025-12-01

Urias-Orellana v. Bondi

58 min
View
A case in which the Court held that a federal court of appeals must defer to the Board of Immigration Appeals’ judgment that a given set of undisputed facts does not demonstrate mistreatment severe enough to constitute “persecution” under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42).
More description
A case in which the Court held that a federal court of appeals must defer to the Board of Immigration Appeals’ judgment that a given set of undisputed facts does not demonstrate mistreatment severe enough to constitute “persecution” under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42).
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web
Published 2025-12-01

Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment

100 min
View
A case in which the Court held that an internet service provider does not commit "contributory copyright infringement" — meaning legal responsibility for copyright violations committed by someone else — simply by continuing to provide internet service to subscribers it knows have been flagged for piracy.
More description
A case in which the Court held that an internet service provider does not commit "contributory copyright infringement" — meaning legal responsibility for copyright violations committed by someone else — simply by continuing to provide internet service to subscribers it knows have been flagged for piracy.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2025-11-12

Rutherford v. United States

81 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether district courts may consider sentencing disparities created by the First Step Act’s nonretroactive reduction of mandatory minimum penalties—which can result in defendants serving sentences decades longer than those imposed for identical conduct today—when determining whether "extraordinary and compelling reasons" warrant a sentence reduction under the compassionate release statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i).
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether district courts may consider sentencing disparities created by the First Step Act’s nonretroactive reduction of mandatory minimum penalties—which can result in defendants serving sentences decades longer than those imposed for identical conduct today—when determining whether "extraordinary and compelling reasons" warrant a sentence reduction under the compassionate release statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i).
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web
Published 2025-11-12

Fernandez v. United States

81 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether a combination of “extraordinary and compelling reasons” that may warrant a discretionary sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. §3582(c)(1)(A) can include reasons that may also be alleged as grounds for vacatur of a sentence under 28 U.S.C. §2255.
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether a combination of “extraordinary and compelling reasons” that may warrant a discretionary sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. §3582(c)(1)(A) can include reasons that may also be alleged as grounds for vacatur of a sentence under 28 U.S.C. §2255.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2025-11-10

The GEO Group, Inc. v. Menocal

56 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether an order denying a government contractor’s claim of derivative sovereign immunity under Yearsley v. W.A. Ross Construction Co. is immediately appealable under the collateral-order doctrine, which permits interlocutory appeals of certain non-final orders that conclusively determine important issues separate from the merits.
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether an order denying a government contractor’s claim of derivative sovereign immunity under Yearsley v. W.A. Ross Construction Co. is immediately appealable under the collateral-order doctrine, which permits interlocutory appeals of certain non-final orders that conclusively determine important issues separate from the merits.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2025-11-10

Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections

110 min
View
A case in which the Court will decide whether an individual may sue a government official in his individual capacity for damages for violations of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA).
More description
A case in which the Court will decide whether an individual may sue a government official in his individual capacity for damages for violations of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA).
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2025-11-05

Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump

159 min
View
A case in which the Court held that the International Emergency Powers Act, 50 U.S.C. § 1701 (“IEEPA”), does not permit the president to impose tariffs.
More description
A case in which the Court held that the International Emergency Powers Act, 50 U.S.C. § 1701 (“IEEPA”), does not permit the president to impose tariffs.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web
Published 2025-11-04

Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited, Inc. v. Burton

35 min
View
A case in which the Court held that a motion to set aside a judgment as void under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(4) must be filed within a "reasonable time" as required by Rule 60(c)(1).
More description
A case in which the Court held that a motion to set aside a judgment as void under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(4) must be filed within a "reasonable time" as required by Rule 60(c)(1).
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2025-11-04

Hain Celestial Group, Inc. v. Palmquist

41 min
View
A case in which the Court held that a federal court cannot create jurisdiction over a lawsuit through its own erroneous ruling. When an appellate court reverses a district court's mistaken dismissal of a party who destroyed complete diversity, the jurisdictional defect never disappears and any trial verdict must be thrown out.
More description
A case in which the Court held that a federal court cannot create jurisdiction over a lawsuit through its own erroneous ruling. When an appellate court reverses a district court's mistaken dismissal of a party who destroyed complete diversity, the jurisdictional defect never disappears and any trial verdict must be thrown out.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2025-11-03

Hencely v. Fluor Corporation

89 min
View
A case in which the Court held that federal law does not block state-law lawsuits against military contractors for actions that the government neither ordered nor authorized.
More description
A case in which the Court held that federal law does not block state-law lawsuits against military contractors for actions that the government neither ordered nor authorized.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2025-11-03

Rico v. United States

54 min
View
A case in which the Court held that the Sentencing Reform Act does not permit a defendant's term of supervised release to automatically extend when the defendant absconds.
More description
A case in which the Court held that the Sentencing Reform Act does not permit a defendant's term of supervised release to automatically extend when the defendant absconds.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2025-10-15

Case v. Montana

75 min
View
A case in which the Court held that law enforcement may enter a home without a search warrant when they have an objectively reasonable basis for believing that an occupant is seriously injured or faces imminent serious injury.
More description
A case in which the Court held that law enforcement may enter a home without a search warrant when they have an objectively reasonable basis for believing that an occupant is seriously injured or faces imminent serious injury.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web Apple
Published 2025-10-15

Louisiana v. Callais

150 min
View
A case in which the Court held that Louisiana’s creation of a second majority-Black congressional district constitutes unconstitutional racial gerrymandering, even when drawn in response to a federal court finding that the state’s prior single majority-Black district likely violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
More description
A case in which the Court held that Louisiana’s creation of a second majority-Black congressional district constitutes unconstitutional racial gerrymandering, even when drawn in response to a federal court finding that the state’s prior single majority-Black district likely violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Audio Web
Show details
Episodes
75
Transcripts
0
0% coverage
Missing transcripts
75
With chapters
0