Search this show’s transcripts

5-4

en us
5-4 is a podcast about how much the Supreme Court sucks. Hosted by Peter Shamshiri, Rhiannon Hamam, and Michael Liroff, it's a progressive and occasionally profane take on the ideological battles at the heart of the Court's most important landmark cases and an irreverent tour of all the ways in which the law is shaped by politics. Subscribe to our premium episodes & much more at fivefourpod.com/support 5-4 is a production of Prologue Projects.
More details
5-4 is a podcast about how much the Supreme Court sucks. Hosted by Peter Shamshiri, Rhiannon Hamam, and Michael Liroff, it's a progressive and occasionally profane take on the ideological battles at the heart of the Court's most important landmark cases and an irreverent tour of all the ways in which the law is shaped by politics. Subscribe to our premium episodes & much more at fivefourpod.com/support 5-4 is a production of Prologue Projects.
Sources and links

Episodes

Page 6 · 50 per page

The legal media isn't doing its job. Except for us. We're killing it.

The full version of this premium episode is available exclusively to our Patreon supporters. To join, visit www.patreon.com/fivefourpod


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

The legal media isn't doing its job. Except for us. We're killing it.

The full version of this premium episode is available exclusively to our Patreon supporters. To join, visit www.patreon.com/fivefourpod


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Feed drop alert again! This week, 5-4 is inviting you to check out an episode of Know Your Enemy. If you like what you hear, subscribe to their feed wherever you get your podcasts. 5-4 will be back with new episodes starting next week.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description
Feed drop alert again! This week, 5-4 is inviting you to check out an episode of Know Your Enemy. If you like what you hear, subscribe to their feed wherever you get your podcasts. 5-4 will be back with new episodes starting next week.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2021-07-15

Prologue Presents FIASCO: BENGHAZI

51 min
View
Feed drop alert! No new episode of 5-4 this week, so instead please consider checking out the new season of FIASCO, the history podcast from Prologue Projects. This season we're tackling the Benghazi scandal, starting with the rise of Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi and ending with the 2016 election. The episode we're sharing today is the fourth one in the series, in which Mitt Romney's presidential campaign pounces on the Benghazi attack as a political issue before the attack itself was even over. To hear the rest of FIASCO: BENGHAZI, subscribe to the Luminary channel on Apple Podcasts by visiting apple.co/fiasco.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description
Feed drop alert! No new episode of 5-4 this week, so instead please consider checking out the new season of FIASCO, the history podcast from Prologue Projects. This season we're tackling the Benghazi scandal, starting with the rise of Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi and ending with the 2016 election. The episode we're sharing today is the fourth one in the series, in which Mitt Romney's presidential campaign pounces on the Benghazi attack as a political issue before the attack itself was even over. To hear the rest of FIASCO: BENGHAZI, subscribe to the Luminary channel on Apple Podcasts by visiting apple.co/fiasco.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2021-07-06

Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid

45 min
View

You know what's exactly the same? When the government kicks you out of your house so it can build a military base, and when a union organizer gives a farm worker a pamphlet. Or at least that's what the majority of justices on the Supreme Court think, based on the ruling in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid.

We want to know what you think about 5-4 - give us your feedback on this survey!

To get premium Patreon-only episodes, access to exclusive events, and membership in the 5-4 Slack, sign up for our Patreon at www.patreon.com/fivefourpod.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

You know what's exactly the same? When the government kicks you out of your house so it can build a military base, and when a union organizer gives a farm worker a pamphlet. Or at least that's what the majority of justices on the Supreme Court think, based on the ruling in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid.

We want to know what you think about 5-4 - give us your feedback on this survey!

To get premium Patreon-only episodes, access to exclusive events, and membership in the 5-4 Slack, sign up for our Patreon at www.patreon.com/fivefourpod.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2021-06-29

Textualism [TEASER]

4 min
View

The hosts discuss Textualism, the legal theory that the dictionary is the real law, God made the dictionary, and what legislators intended is a secondary consideration at best.

The full version of this premium episode is available exclusively to our Patreon supporters. To join, visit www.patreon.com/fivefourpod


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

The hosts discuss Textualism, the legal theory that the dictionary is the real law, God made the dictionary, and what legislators intended is a secondary consideration at best.

The full version of this premium episode is available exclusively to our Patreon supporters. To join, visit www.patreon.com/fivefourpod


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2021-06-29

Fulton v. Philadelphia

35 min
View

In this emergency episode, the hosts discuss one of the spiciest cases from this term, Fulton v. Philadelphia. And you know how conservatives hate spice, so suffice it to say, this holding didn't come out great!


Patreon members got this episode a week ago! To get early access to emergency episodes, access to exclusive events, and membership in the 5-4 Slack, sign up for our Patreon at www.patreon.com/fivefourpod.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

In this emergency episode, the hosts discuss one of the spiciest cases from this term, Fulton v. Philadelphia. And you know how conservatives hate spice, so suffice it to say, this holding didn't come out great!


Patreon members got this episode a week ago! To get early access to emergency episodes, access to exclusive events, and membership in the 5-4 Slack, sign up for our Patreon at www.patreon.com/fivefourpod.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2021-06-22

Fulton v. Philadelphia [TEASER]

4 min
View

In this emergency episode, the hosts discuss one of the spiciest cases from this term, Fulton v. Philadelphia. And you know how conservatives hate spice, so suffice it to say, this holding didn't come out great!


Patreon members can hear the full episode now, instead of waiting a week! To join, visit www.patreon.com/fivefourpod


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

In this emergency episode, the hosts discuss one of the spiciest cases from this term, Fulton v. Philadelphia. And you know how conservatives hate spice, so suffice it to say, this holding didn't come out great!


Patreon members can hear the full episode now, instead of waiting a week! To join, visit www.patreon.com/fivefourpod


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2021-06-21

Meet Nick Wallace

24 min
View

Congrats grads! Our gift to you is an interview with Nick Wallace. Nick is the former Stanford law student who was threatened with having his diploma withheld because the snowflakes in his campus' Federalist Society were triggered.

Our Patreon supporters received this episode a week early. You can get early access, exclusive episodes, membership in the 5-4 Slack, and more too, if you become a member.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

Congrats grads! Our gift to you is an interview with Nick Wallace. Nick is the former Stanford law student who was threatened with having his diploma withheld because the snowflakes in his campus' Federalist Society were triggered.

Our Patreon supporters received this episode a week early. You can get early access, exclusive episodes, membership in the 5-4 Slack, and more too, if you become a member.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2021-06-15

Smith v. Maryland

43 min
View

Warrantless police surveillance of your telephone is A-OK, according to the holding in Smith v. Maryland - as long as the cops only look at WHO you call, not WHAT you say. 

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon) and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.

To get premium Patreon-only episodes, access to exclusive events, and membership in the 5-4 Slack, sign up for our Patreon at www.patreon.com/fivefourpod.


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

Warrantless police surveillance of your telephone is A-OK, according to the holding in Smith v. Maryland - as long as the cops only look at WHO you call, not WHAT you say. 

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon) and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.

To get premium Patreon-only episodes, access to exclusive events, and membership in the 5-4 Slack, sign up for our Patreon at www.patreon.com/fivefourpod.


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2021-06-08

5-4 x Even More News - Abortion Rights

50 min
View

Peter and Rhiannon join Katy Stoll and Cody Johnston from Even More News, to talk about what the Supreme Court's decision to hear a Mississippi abortion ban case means.

Follow Even More News (@somemorenews), Katy Stoll (@katystoll) and Cody Johnston (@drmistercody) on Twitter. They're on Patreon, and so is 5-4. To get premium Patreon-only episodes, access to exclusive events, and membership in the 5-4 Slack, sign up at www.patreon.com/fivefourpod.


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

Peter and Rhiannon join Katy Stoll and Cody Johnston from Even More News, to talk about what the Supreme Court's decision to hear a Mississippi abortion ban case means.

Follow Even More News (@somemorenews), Katy Stoll (@katystoll) and Cody Johnston (@drmistercody) on Twitter. They're on Patreon, and so is 5-4. To get premium Patreon-only episodes, access to exclusive events, and membership in the 5-4 Slack, sign up at www.patreon.com/fivefourpod.


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2021-06-01

Brett Kavanaugh [TEASER]

4 min
View

The hosts pound some brewskis with Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

The full version of this premium episode is available exclusively to our Patreon supporters. To join, visit www.patreon.com/fivefourpod

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon) and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

The hosts pound some brewskis with Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

The full version of this premium episode is available exclusively to our Patreon supporters. To join, visit www.patreon.com/fivefourpod

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon) and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2021-05-25

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes

49 min
View

The hosts discuss a case in which the Supreme Court denied "class" status to female Wal-Mart employees in a gender discrimination class action, proving in this 5-4 decision that boys will be boys.

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon) and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.

To get premium Patreon-only episodes, access to exclusive events, and membership in the 5-4 Slack, sign up for our Patreon at www.patreon.com/fivefourpod.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

The hosts discuss a case in which the Supreme Court denied "class" status to female Wal-Mart employees in a gender discrimination class action, proving in this 5-4 decision that boys will be boys.

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon) and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.

To get premium Patreon-only episodes, access to exclusive events, and membership in the 5-4 Slack, sign up for our Patreon at www.patreon.com/fivefourpod.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Hey, remember JOHNNIE COCHRAN? While you wait for next week's episode of 5-4, please enjoy this special feed drop from Celebrity Book Club with Steven and Lily, a new podcast from Prologue Projects in which NYC comedians Steven Phillips-Horst and Lily Marotta take on a different celebrity memoir every week and use it as a canvas for exploring pop culture, the sick 'n' twisted lives of the rich 'n' famous, and their own lifelong friendship. The subject of this week's episode was selected with 5-4 listeners in mind: It's Johnnie Cochran's Journey to Justice, in which the world's most famous lawyer — not including Peter, Rhiannon, and Michael — opens up the briefcase on his life in the law. If you like what you hear, subscribe to Celebrity Book Club with Steven and Lily now.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description
Hey, remember JOHNNIE COCHRAN? While you wait for next week's episode of 5-4, please enjoy this special feed drop from Celebrity Book Club with Steven and Lily, a new podcast from Prologue Projects in which NYC comedians Steven Phillips-Horst and Lily Marotta take on a different celebrity memoir every week and use it as a canvas for exploring pop culture, the sick 'n' twisted lives of the rich 'n' famous, and their own lifelong friendship. The subject of this week's episode was selected with 5-4 listeners in mind: It's Johnnie Cochran's Journey to Justice, in which the world's most famous lawyer — not including Peter, Rhiannon, and Michael — opens up the briefcase on his life in the law. If you like what you hear, subscribe to Celebrity Book Club with Steven and Lily now.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2021-05-18

Jones v. Mississippi

54 min
View

The hosts discuss the 8th Amendment and juvenile life without parole, and the tension between modern neuroscience, and the conservative impulse to maintain 200-year-old traditions of punishment.

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon) and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.

To get premium Patreon-only episodes, access to exclusive events, and membership in the 5-4 Slack, sign up for our Patreon at www.patreon.com/fivefourpod.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

The hosts discuss the 8th Amendment and juvenile life without parole, and the tension between modern neuroscience, and the conservative impulse to maintain 200-year-old traditions of punishment.

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon) and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.

To get premium Patreon-only episodes, access to exclusive events, and membership in the 5-4 Slack, sign up for our Patreon at www.patreon.com/fivefourpod.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2021-05-11

Roe v. Wade: The Movie [TEASER]

4 min
View

In this first-ever 5-4 film review, the hosts have looked into the abyss and are ready to render their verdict.

The full version of this premium episode is available exclusively to our Patreon supporters. To join, visit www.patreon.com/fivefourpod

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon) and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.



Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

In this first-ever 5-4 film review, the hosts have looked into the abyss and are ready to render their verdict.

The full version of this premium episode is available exclusively to our Patreon supporters. To join, visit www.patreon.com/fivefourpod

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon) and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.



Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2021-05-04

Get Us to Seven feat. Rep. Mondaire Jones

66 min
View

The hosts are joined by Rep. Mondaire Jones to discuss the Judiciary Act of 2021, Supreme Court reform, and the Biden Commission.

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon) and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.

To get premium Patreon-only episodes, access to exclusive events, and membership in the 5-4 Slack, sign up for our Patreon at www.patreon.com/fivefourpod.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

The hosts are joined by Rep. Mondaire Jones to discuss the Judiciary Act of 2021, Supreme Court reform, and the Biden Commission.

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon) and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.

To get premium Patreon-only episodes, access to exclusive events, and membership in the 5-4 Slack, sign up for our Patreon at www.patreon.com/fivefourpod.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2021-04-27

Bowles v. Russell

55 min
View
The hosts are joined by Josie Duffy Rice and Jay Willis of The Appeal, to discuss "Worst Supreme Court Justice of All Time" bracketology, and simple arithmetic. This week's case is Bowles v. Russell, in which the petitioner sought to have his appeal heard because a judge had miscalculated a deadline, and his lawyer had the audacity to adhere to it. The court denied the petitioner, citing "rules are rules, even when they aren't actually rules."

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description
The hosts are joined by Josie Duffy Rice and Jay Willis of The Appeal, to discuss "Worst Supreme Court Justice of All Time" bracketology, and simple arithmetic. This week's case is Bowles v. Russell, in which the petitioner sought to have his appeal heard because a judge had miscalculated a deadline, and his lawyer had the audacity to adhere to it. The court denied the petitioner, citing "rules are rules, even when they aren't actually rules."

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2021-04-20

The Insular Cases [TEASER]

5 min
View

The hosts discuss the Insular Cases, a series of holdings from 1901 that delineated the Constitutional rights afforded to citizens of US territories like Puerto Rico and the Philippines. And by "delineated" we mean "decimated."


In these cases, and since these cases, the Supreme Court has repeatedly used economic justifications to create and reinforce racist policies that disadvantage and disenfranchise people who live in our country's de facto colonies. Do you love live-fire military exercises, half a millennium of genocidal rule, and not getting to vote in federal elections? Visit scenic Guam!

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

The hosts discuss the Insular Cases, a series of holdings from 1901 that delineated the Constitutional rights afforded to citizens of US territories like Puerto Rico and the Philippines. And by "delineated" we mean "decimated."


In these cases, and since these cases, the Supreme Court has repeatedly used economic justifications to create and reinforce racist policies that disadvantage and disenfranchise people who live in our country's de facto colonies. Do you love live-fire military exercises, half a millennium of genocidal rule, and not getting to vote in federal elections? Visit scenic Guam!

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere

The hosts discuss Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), a 5-4 decision in which the Supreme Court denied a worker back pay that he was owed after being unlawfully terminated for union organizing, citing his lack of authorization to work in the United States. The decision completely rejected the ruling of the NLRB, guidance from the Department of Justice, standing immigration law, and basic human decency.


Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon) and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.


To get premium Patreon-only episodes, access to exclusive events, and membership in the 5-4 Slack, sign up for our Patreon at www.patreon.com/fivefourpod.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

The hosts discuss Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), a 5-4 decision in which the Supreme Court denied a worker back pay that he was owed after being unlawfully terminated for union organizing, citing his lack of authorization to work in the United States. The decision completely rejected the ruling of the NLRB, guidance from the Department of Justice, standing immigration law, and basic human decency.


Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon) and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.


To get premium Patreon-only episodes, access to exclusive events, and membership in the 5-4 Slack, sign up for our Patreon at www.patreon.com/fivefourpod.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2021-04-06

5-4 x Even More News

57 min
View

The hosts appear on Even More News, with hosts Katy Stoll and Cody Johnston, to talk about voting rights cases at the Supreme Court, and H.R.1.


Follow Even More News (@somemorenews), Katy Stoll (@katystoll) and Cody Johnston (@drmistercody) on Twitter. They're on Patreon, and so is 5-4. To get premium Patreon-only episodes, access to exclusive events, and membership in the 5-4 Slack, sign up at www.patreon.com/fivefourpod.



Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

The hosts appear on Even More News, with hosts Katy Stoll and Cody Johnston, to talk about voting rights cases at the Supreme Court, and H.R.1.


Follow Even More News (@somemorenews), Katy Stoll (@katystoll) and Cody Johnston (@drmistercody) on Twitter. They're on Patreon, and so is 5-4. To get premium Patreon-only episodes, access to exclusive events, and membership in the 5-4 Slack, sign up at www.patreon.com/fivefourpod.



Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2021-03-30

Connick v. Thompson

57 min
View

The hosts discuss Connick v. Thompson, a 5-4 decision in which the Supreme Court holds that a conspiracy to convict an innocent man, by systematically withholding evidence that could prove his innocence, does not constitute a "pattern."  Where's your dictionary now, Scalia?


Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon) and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.


To get premium Patreon-only episodes, access to exclusive events, and membership in the 5-4 Slack, sign up for our Patreon at www.patreon.com/fivefourpod.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

The hosts discuss Connick v. Thompson, a 5-4 decision in which the Supreme Court holds that a conspiracy to convict an innocent man, by systematically withholding evidence that could prove his innocence, does not constitute a "pattern."  Where's your dictionary now, Scalia?


Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon) and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.


To get premium Patreon-only episodes, access to exclusive events, and membership in the 5-4 Slack, sign up for our Patreon at www.patreon.com/fivefourpod.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere

The hosts discuss Trump's appointees to the federal bench, and the effects that this rogue's gallery of cronies has had - and will continue to have - on the judiciary.


Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon) and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.


The full version of this premium episode is available exclusively to our Patreon supporters. To join, visit www.patreon.com/fivefourpod



Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

The hosts discuss Trump's appointees to the federal bench, and the effects that this rogue's gallery of cronies has had - and will continue to have - on the judiciary.


Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon) and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.


The full version of this premium episode is available exclusively to our Patreon supporters. To join, visit www.patreon.com/fivefourpod



Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere

The hosts discuss Toyota Motor Manufacturing v. Williams,where the Supreme Court unanimously narrowed the definition of disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act. 


Thanks to Erin Hawley (@geekygimp) for her help prepping this episode.


Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon) and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.


To get premium Patreon-only episodes, access to exclusive events, and membership in the 5-4 Slack, sign up for our Patreon at www.patreon.com/fivefourpod.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

The hosts discuss Toyota Motor Manufacturing v. Williams,where the Supreme Court unanimously narrowed the definition of disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act. 


Thanks to Erin Hawley (@geekygimp) for her help prepping this episode.


Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon) and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.


To get premium Patreon-only episodes, access to exclusive events, and membership in the 5-4 Slack, sign up for our Patreon at www.patreon.com/fivefourpod.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere

The hosts are joined by Alec Karakatsanis (@equalityAlec), founder and executive director of Civil Rights Corps, and the author of Usual Cruelty: The Complicity of Lawyers in the Criminal Injustice System. They discuss San Antonio ISD v Rodriguez, an equal protection case from 1973, which is widely cited by conservatives as holding that the equal protection clause does not protect impoverished people. The hosts beg to differ.


Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon) and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.


To get premium Patreon-only episodes, access to exclusive events, and membership in the 5-4 Slack, sign up for our Patreon.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

The hosts are joined by Alec Karakatsanis (@equalityAlec), founder and executive director of Civil Rights Corps, and the author of Usual Cruelty: The Complicity of Lawyers in the Criminal Injustice System. They discuss San Antonio ISD v Rodriguez, an equal protection case from 1973, which is widely cited by conservatives as holding that the equal protection clause does not protect impoverished people. The hosts beg to differ.


Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon) and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.


To get premium Patreon-only episodes, access to exclusive events, and membership in the 5-4 Slack, sign up for our Patreon.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2021-03-02

Antonin Scalia [TEASER]

3 min
View

Here's a taste of what Patreon supporters get! In this episode, Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) discuss former Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.


To get the full episode, sign up for our Patreon.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

Here's a taste of what Patreon supporters get! In this episode, Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) discuss former Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.


To get the full episode, sign up for our Patreon.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2021-02-23

McCleskey v. Kemp ft. Josie Duffy Rice

49 min
View

The hosts are joined by Josie Duffy Rice of The Appeal to discuss another death penalty case — McCleskey v. Kemp. In this 1987 decision, the Supreme Court held that statistical evidence of systemic racial disparities is not enough to prove discrimination. Instead, defendants have to show that individual prosecutors, judges or juries pursued them with racist intent. As a result, states were basically let off the hook for perpetuating systemic racism in death penalty cases.


Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon) and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

The hosts are joined by Josie Duffy Rice of The Appeal to discuss another death penalty case — McCleskey v. Kemp. In this 1987 decision, the Supreme Court held that statistical evidence of systemic racial disparities is not enough to prove discrimination. Instead, defendants have to show that individual prosecutors, judges or juries pursued them with racist intent. As a result, states were basically let off the hook for perpetuating systemic racism in death penalty cases.


Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon) and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2021-02-16

Atkins v. Virginia

57 min
View
The hosts discuss Atkins v. Virginia, a case in which the Supreme Court held that it is unconstitutional to impose the death penalty on people with intellectual disabilities. But the Court also created a loophole by allowing states to decide the standard for who qualifies as intellectually disabled. As a result of the Court’s lack of clarity, some states have continued to execute people with intellectual disabilities to this day.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description
The hosts discuss Atkins v. Virginia, a case in which the Supreme Court held that it is unconstitutional to impose the death penalty on people with intellectual disabilities. But the Court also created a loophole by allowing states to decide the standard for who qualifies as intellectually disabled. As a result of the Court’s lack of clarity, some states have continued to execute people with intellectual disabilities to this day.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2021-02-09

US v. Morrison

49 min
View

The hosts discuss a case in which the Supreme Court struck down a provision of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) that allowed women to sue abusers in federal court for damages. In the process, the Court constrained the ability of Congress to regulate interstate commerce, not only weakening an important civil rights law, but also making it more difficult for Congress to pass progressive legislation going forward.


Follow eter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

The hosts discuss a case in which the Supreme Court struck down a provision of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) that allowed women to sue abusers in federal court for damages. In the process, the Court constrained the ability of Congress to regulate interstate commerce, not only weakening an important civil rights law, but also making it more difficult for Congress to pass progressive legislation going forward.


Follow eter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2021-02-02

Navarette v. California

49 min
View

Your hosts discuss Navarette v. California, which held that an unverified anonymous tip about reckless driving could be sufficient grounds for the police to pull over a car. The case exemplifies how deferential the Supreme Court is to police power, and has resulted in an increased reliance on anonymous tips by the cops, and a corresponding erosion of citizens’ privacy rights.


Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

Your hosts discuss Navarette v. California, which held that an unverified anonymous tip about reckless driving could be sufficient grounds for the police to pull over a car. The case exemplifies how deferential the Supreme Court is to police power, and has resulted in an increased reliance on anonymous tips by the cops, and a corresponding erosion of citizens’ privacy rights.


Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2021-01-26

Morse v. Frederick

40 min
View
In 2002, a student held up a banner that said “Bong Hits 4 Jesus” at an Olympic torch relay, in full view of his classmates and teachers. When he was suspended, he claimed his banner was protected free speech under the First Amendment. The Supreme Court disagreed. In this episode, your hosts discuss the contours of student free speech, the Court’s puritanical moralizing on marijuana, and the importance of absurdist speech in creating real change.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description
In 2002, a student held up a banner that said “Bong Hits 4 Jesus” at an Olympic torch relay, in full view of his classmates and teachers. When he was suspended, he claimed his banner was protected free speech under the First Amendment. The Supreme Court disagreed. In this episode, your hosts discuss the contours of student free speech, the Court’s puritanical moralizing on marijuana, and the importance of absurdist speech in creating real change.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2021-01-19

The Rise and Fall of Roe v. Wade, Pt. 2

60 min
View
In the second part of a two-episode series on abortion rights, the hosts discuss Planned Parenthood v. Casey, a 1992 case in which the Supreme Court made it easier for states to restrict abortion access so long as abortion regulations don’t create an “undue burden.” The vague standard set lawmakers on a new path of attacking abortion access and fueled anti-abortion groups’ efforts to spread stigma and misinformation, setting up Roe v. Wade for a death by a thousand cuts.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description
In the second part of a two-episode series on abortion rights, the hosts discuss Planned Parenthood v. Casey, a 1992 case in which the Supreme Court made it easier for states to restrict abortion access so long as abortion regulations don’t create an “undue burden.” The vague standard set lawmakers on a new path of attacking abortion access and fueled anti-abortion groups’ efforts to spread stigma and misinformation, setting up Roe v. Wade for a death by a thousand cuts.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2021-01-12

The Rise and Fall of Roe v. Wade, Pt. 1

54 min
View
The hosts take on one of the Supreme Court’s most famous decisions, Roe v. Wade. In this first episode of a two-part series, they look at the legal and factual origins of Roe v. Wade. They also discuss how Roe was weaponized by the conservative legal movement to rally against an interpretation of the Constitution that allows for flexibility in favor of a far more rigid approach.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description
The hosts take on one of the Supreme Court’s most famous decisions, Roe v. Wade. In this first episode of a two-part series, they look at the legal and factual origins of Roe v. Wade. They also discuss how Roe was weaponized by the conservative legal movement to rally against an interpretation of the Constitution that allows for flexibility in favor of a far more rigid approach.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2020-12-29

5-4 x Know Your Enemy

84 min
View

Peter, Rhiannon, and Michael join the hosts of the podcast Know Your Enemy for a conversation about the conservative legal movement. They discuss the origins of conservative doctrines like originalism and textualism, and the rise of the Federalist Society from a small group of conservative students and academics to an organization whose members constitute the majority of the Supreme Court.


Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

Peter, Rhiannon, and Michael join the hosts of the podcast Know Your Enemy for a conversation about the conservative legal movement. They discuss the origins of conservative doctrines like originalism and textualism, and the rise of the Federalist Society from a small group of conservative students and academics to an organization whose members constitute the majority of the Supreme Court.


Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2020-12-15

Herrera v. Collins

49 min
View
The hosts take on a 1993 death penalty case that has been called one of the worst decisions in capital punishment jurisprudence. Herrera v. Collins asks whether someone on death row can have new evidence of their innocence reviewed in federal habeas corpus proceedings, often the last resort for someone who has exhausted their appeals. In a 6-to-3 vote, the Court rejected the claim, barely shying away from holding that the Constitution does not protect against an innocent person being executed.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description
The hosts take on a 1993 death penalty case that has been called one of the worst decisions in capital punishment jurisprudence. Herrera v. Collins asks whether someone on death row can have new evidence of their innocence reviewed in federal habeas corpus proceedings, often the last resort for someone who has exhausted their appeals. In a 6-to-3 vote, the Court rejected the claim, barely shying away from holding that the Constitution does not protect against an innocent person being executed.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2020-12-08

Roman Catholic Diocese v. Cuomo

43 min
View

The hosts discuss Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo, a recent case about COVID-19-related restrictions on religious gatherings. In it, the Supreme Court struck down hard capacity caps on religious gatherings in high-risk areas. The case has already spawned more challenges to pandemic-related restrictions on religious gatherings and likely foreshadows the expansion of legal exemptions for religious groups.


Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

The hosts discuss Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo, a recent case about COVID-19-related restrictions on religious gatherings. In it, the Supreme Court struck down hard capacity caps on religious gatherings in high-risk areas. The case has already spawned more challenges to pandemic-related restrictions on religious gatherings and likely foreshadows the expansion of legal exemptions for religious groups.


Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2020-12-01

Ashcroft v. Iqbal

55 min
View

The hosts discuss Ashcroft v. Iqbal, a 2008 case in which the Court created a new pleading standard for legal complaints that made it much harder for plaintiffs to bring their cases. Here, a Pakistani immigrant who claimed he was detained and tortured in the wake of 9/11 had his case dismissed because, according to the Court, his allegations that Bush administration officials were responsible for his treatment were not “plausible.” 

 

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter. 

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

The hosts discuss Ashcroft v. Iqbal, a 2008 case in which the Court created a new pleading standard for legal complaints that made it much harder for plaintiffs to bring their cases. Here, a Pakistani immigrant who claimed he was detained and tortured in the wake of 9/11 had his case dismissed because, according to the Court, his allegations that Bush administration officials were responsible for his treatment were not “plausible.” 

 

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter. 

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2020-11-17

Arizona Free Enterprise v. Bennett

47 min
View

The hosts return to examining cases with a little-known campaign finance decision from 2011: Arizona Free Enterprise Club PAC v. Bennett. They discuss the Supreme Court’s ruling, which declared unconstitutional a matching funds program for political candidates who opt out of private fundraising, effectively killing public campaign financing. The hosts also talk about the Trump campaign’s ongoing efforts -- in the courts and otherwise -- to contest the results of the 2020 election, and how likely they are to affect the Biden victory.

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter. 

Please support our sponsors: 

HelixSleep.com/FiveFour

BuyRaycon.com/FiveFour

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

The hosts return to examining cases with a little-known campaign finance decision from 2011: Arizona Free Enterprise Club PAC v. Bennett. They discuss the Supreme Court’s ruling, which declared unconstitutional a matching funds program for political candidates who opt out of private fundraising, effectively killing public campaign financing. The hosts also talk about the Trump campaign’s ongoing efforts -- in the courts and otherwise -- to contest the results of the 2020 election, and how likely they are to affect the Biden victory.

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter. 

Please support our sponsors: 

HelixSleep.com/FiveFour

BuyRaycon.com/FiveFour

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2020-11-10

The Courts Can’t Save Him

52 min
View

The hosts look back at the week-long presidential election, which Joe Biden won. They discuss the challenges mounted by the Trump campaign in various states and explain why none of them is likely to change the outcome of the election. They also reflect on some state-level initiatives and put forth their strategy for how President Biden should deal with a split Senate, especially on matters pertaining to the Supreme Court.  

 

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter. 

 

Please support our sponsors: HelixSleep.com/FiveFour

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

The hosts look back at the week-long presidential election, which Joe Biden won. They discuss the challenges mounted by the Trump campaign in various states and explain why none of them is likely to change the outcome of the election. They also reflect on some state-level initiatives and put forth their strategy for how President Biden should deal with a split Senate, especially on matters pertaining to the Supreme Court.  

 

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter. 

 

Please support our sponsors: HelixSleep.com/FiveFour

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2020-11-03

Reliving Bush v. Gore

60 min
View

The hosts reflect on a string of cases pertaining to the coming election, discuss the legacy of Bush v. Gore, and the significance of Justice Kavanaugh recently citing Justice Rehnquist’s infamous concurrence in the case. They then replay their original analysis of the 2000 election case that put George W. Bush in the White House. 

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter. 

Please support our sponsors: HelixSleep.com/FiveFour

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

The hosts reflect on a string of cases pertaining to the coming election, discuss the legacy of Bush v. Gore, and the significance of Justice Kavanaugh recently citing Justice Rehnquist’s infamous concurrence in the case. They then replay their original analysis of the 2000 election case that put George W. Bush in the White House. 

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter. 

Please support our sponsors: HelixSleep.com/FiveFour

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2020-10-27

How to Fix the Court feat. Rep. Ro Khanna

72 min
View

The hosts discuss options for reforming the court — from court packing, to term limits for judges, to stripping the court of jurisdiction to hear cases pertaining to new laws. They also speak to Congressman Ro Khanna about court reform, and about the bill he has introduced to limit Supreme Court Justices' tenure. But they remain clear on their preferred option: packing the court to include more liberal justices.

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter. 

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

The hosts discuss options for reforming the court — from court packing, to term limits for judges, to stripping the court of jurisdiction to hear cases pertaining to new laws. They also speak to Congressman Ro Khanna about court reform, and about the bill he has introduced to limit Supreme Court Justices' tenure. But they remain clear on their preferred option: packing the court to include more liberal justices.

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter. 

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2020-10-20

Rucho v. Common Cause

60 min
View

The hosts reflect on the Amy Coney Barrett confirmation hearings, then move on to discussing gerrymandering, the practice of drawing up voting districts to favor a particular political party. Specifically, they talk about Rucho v. Common Cause, a 2019 case in which the Supreme Court not only refused to rule on two states’ gerrymandered maps, they found all partisan gerrymandering to be outside the purview of the Court going forward. 

 

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter. 

 

Please support our sponsors: 

 

BuyRaycon.com/FIVEFOUR  

HelixSleep.com/FIVEFOUR

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

The hosts reflect on the Amy Coney Barrett confirmation hearings, then move on to discussing gerrymandering, the practice of drawing up voting districts to favor a particular political party. Specifically, they talk about Rucho v. Common Cause, a 2019 case in which the Supreme Court not only refused to rule on two states’ gerrymandered maps, they found all partisan gerrymandering to be outside the purview of the Court going forward. 

 

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter. 

 

Please support our sponsors: 

 

BuyRaycon.com/FIVEFOUR  

HelixSleep.com/FIVEFOUR

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2020-10-13

The Electoral College Coup Is Coming

47 min
View

The hosts discuss the past, present, and future of the Electoral College, and all the ways it could be used to stage a procedural coup in the upcoming election. They also talk about how the Electoral College could be restructured to give greater representation to states with large populations, like California. But if it were up to them, they’d get rid of this undemocratic institution all together, and switch to a system in which the president is chosen by popular vote.

 

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter. 

 

Please support our sponsors: 

 

BuyRaycon.com/FIVEFOUR  

HelixSleep.com/FIVEFOUR

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

The hosts discuss the past, present, and future of the Electoral College, and all the ways it could be used to stage a procedural coup in the upcoming election. They also talk about how the Electoral College could be restructured to give greater representation to states with large populations, like California. But if it were up to them, they’d get rid of this undemocratic institution all together, and switch to a system in which the president is chosen by popular vote.

 

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter. 

 

Please support our sponsors: 

 

BuyRaycon.com/FIVEFOUR  

HelixSleep.com/FIVEFOUR

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere

The hosts discuss the recent news that Donald Trump has contracted COVID-19 and what implications it might have for the upcoming election and the Supreme Court. Then they answer listener questions, covering everything from court reform to how to decide if you should go to law school.

 

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter. 

 

Please support our sponsors: 

 

BuyRaycon.com/FIVEFOUR 

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

The hosts discuss the recent news that Donald Trump has contracted COVID-19 and what implications it might have for the upcoming election and the Supreme Court. Then they answer listener questions, covering everything from court reform to how to decide if you should go to law school.

 

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter. 

 

Please support our sponsors: 

 

BuyRaycon.com/FIVEFOUR 

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2020-09-29

Amy Coney Barrett is a Right Wing Freak

49 min
View

The hosts talk about Amy Coney Barrett, who has been nominated to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court. They discuss the nominee's judicial record, her faith, and what it means to be nominated by President Trump at this time.

 

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

The hosts talk about Amy Coney Barrett, who has been nominated to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court. They discuss the nominee's judicial record, her faith, and what it means to be nominated by President Trump at this time.

 

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2020-09-21

What RBG Didn't Understand

45 min
View

On this week's episode of 5-4, Peter, Rhiannon, and Michael are discussing the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Specifically, the hosts talk about the consequences of RBG's decision not to step down from the Court during Barack Obama's presidency, what that decision tells us about her, and what lies ahead.

 

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

On this week's episode of 5-4, Peter, Rhiannon, and Michael are discussing the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Specifically, the hosts talk about the consequences of RBG's decision not to step down from the Court during Barack Obama's presidency, what that decision tells us about her, and what lies ahead.

 

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2020-09-15

LA v. Lyons

41 min
View

On this week’s episode of 5-4, Peter, Rhiannon, and Michael are talking about police use of chokeholds. In 1983, the Supreme Court held in City of Los Angeles v. Lyons that a man who had been injured by a brutal police chokehold did not have standing to sue for an injunction—in other words, he could not ask the Court to order the police to stop using chokeholds. The Court’s decision allowed the practice to continue, and chokeholds have been a focus of police reform efforts and protests since then, particularly after the 2014 death of Eric Garner.

 

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter. 

 

Please support our sponsors: 

 

keeps.com/fivefour

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

On this week’s episode of 5-4, Peter, Rhiannon, and Michael are talking about police use of chokeholds. In 1983, the Supreme Court held in City of Los Angeles v. Lyons that a man who had been injured by a brutal police chokehold did not have standing to sue for an injunction—in other words, he could not ask the Court to order the police to stop using chokeholds. The Court’s decision allowed the practice to continue, and chokeholds have been a focus of police reform efforts and protests since then, particularly after the 2014 death of Eric Garner.

 

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter. 

 

Please support our sponsors: 

 

keeps.com/fivefour

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2020-09-08

Voting Rights

50 min
View

On this week’s episode of 5-4, Peter, Rhiannon, and Michael are discussing the right to vote. As the 2020 presidential election draws near, the Trump campaign has already started suing states over the use of mail-in ballots. The hosts talk through the basics of election law history and explain how individual citizens' right to vote is only sort of provided for in the Constitution.

 

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter. 

 

Please support our sponsors: 

 

buyraycon.com/fivefour

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

On this week’s episode of 5-4, Peter, Rhiannon, and Michael are discussing the right to vote. As the 2020 presidential election draws near, the Trump campaign has already started suing states over the use of mail-in ballots. The hosts talk through the basics of election law history and explain how individual citizens' right to vote is only sort of provided for in the Constitution.

 

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter. 

 

Please support our sponsors: 

 

buyraycon.com/fivefour

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2020-09-01

Flood v. Kuhn

45 min
View

On this week’s episode of 5-4, Peter (@The_Law_Boy) and Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon) are joined by their friend Adam to discuss the 1972 case that exempted professional baseball from antitrust law.

Please support our sponsors:

Helix

Raycon

  

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

On this week’s episode of 5-4, Peter (@The_Law_Boy) and Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon) are joined by their friend Adam to discuss the 1972 case that exempted professional baseball from antitrust law.

Please support our sponsors:

Helix

Raycon

  

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2020-08-25

Nielsen v. Preap

48 min
View

On this week’s episode of 5-4, Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) talk about the 2019 case that denied immigrants who have committed certain crimes the right to a bond hearing, and illustrated the futility of objectively interpreting the law.  

 

Please support our sponsors: 

magicspoon.com/FIVEFOUR 

HelixSleep.com/FIVEFOUR  

jordanharbinger.com/subscribe 

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description

On this week’s episode of 5-4, Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) talk about the 2019 case that denied immigrants who have committed certain crimes the right to a bond hearing, and illustrated the futility of objectively interpreting the law.  

 

Please support our sponsors: 

magicspoon.com/FIVEFOUR 

HelixSleep.com/FIVEFOUR  

jordanharbinger.com/subscribe 

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Published 2020-08-18

Boy Scouts of America v. Dale

39 min
View
On this week’s episode of 5-4, Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) talk about the 2000 case that allowed Boy Scouts to discriminate against gay scout leaders.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
More description
On this week’s episode of 5-4, Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) talk about the 2000 case that allowed Boy Scouts to discriminate against gay scout leaders.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



Our Sponsors:
* Check out Mint Mobile and use my code mintmobile.com/fivefour for a great deal: https://www.mintmobile.com
* Check out Quince and use my code quince.com/FIVEFOUR for a great deal: https://www.quince.com


Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Extract Knowledge
Listen elsewhere
Show details
Episodes
327
Transcripts
47
14% coverage
Missing transcripts
280
With chapters
0